Wilson's Theorem for prime powers
(The Proof of Lemma 1 and its Corollary)
Wilson's Theorem, states that
.
We generalize it, to prime powers, as follows:
Lemma 1 For any given prime power
we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8ff7/c8ff7a150010a71865802aa9cb5b116a59876639" alt=""
where
is -1,
unless
in which case
is 1.
Proof:
Pair up each m in the product with its inverse
to see that
is congruent, modulo
, to the product of
those
that are not distinct from their inverses
;
that is those m for which
. It is
easy to show that the only such m are 1 and
unless
(when one only has m=1) or
when one has the additional
solutions
and
. The result then follows.
Corollary 1
For any given prime power
,
let
be the least non-negative residue of
.
Then
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74bb1/74bb1d92c2800cd3ff3b7de054673c6ef2d0e286" alt=""
where
is as in Lemma 1.
Proof:
We write each r in the product below as
, to get
(20)data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e97c/9e97cc2953d6936fe30032d7d2bc646a50451730" alt=""
by Lemma 1, where
signifies a product over integers not divisible by p.